PhlangePhace
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 301
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- No
Hi all,
I've heard good things about the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II and read that it's a realistic option for those unable/unwilling to spend the extra on a Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS.
So I thought I'd whittled down my choice of lens to pursue next.
But after a bit of research, I now see there is a (new?) VC version, Tamrons answer to IS :shrug:
So,....my question to all you knowledgable people, is.... Has anyone any experience with Tamrons VC ?
Is it any good ?
For the 17-50mm in particular (maybe it's early days to tell) does the VC spoil a perfectly good lens (i.e. has the addition of VC to this model had a detrimental affect on other aspects of this lens?)
I've heard good things about the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II and read that it's a realistic option for those unable/unwilling to spend the extra on a Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS.
So I thought I'd whittled down my choice of lens to pursue next.
But after a bit of research, I now see there is a (new?) VC version, Tamrons answer to IS :shrug:
So,....my question to all you knowledgable people, is.... Has anyone any experience with Tamrons VC ?
Is it any good ?
For the 17-50mm in particular (maybe it's early days to tell) does the VC spoil a perfectly good lens (i.e. has the addition of VC to this model had a detrimental affect on other aspects of this lens?)
