The Greek Suspended / Banned Messages 2,092 Name Chris Edit My Images Yes 19 Sep 2011 #1 Simple question, is a 15 year old 17-35/2.8 lens still worth £400+ or has it had its day?
futureal33 Suspended / Banned Messages 2,390 Name Nick Edit My Images Yes 19 Sep 2011 #2 From what i've read it goes 16-35 F2.8L II > 17-40 F4L > 17-35 F2.8L HTH
OP The Greek Suspended / Banned Messages 2,092 Name Chris Edit My Images Yes 19 Sep 2011 #3 I am looking to buy a 17-40 f/4 and Stumble upon a nice 17-35 f2.8, TBH I'm very tempted. The only drawback being age, UL 1997 I think.
I am looking to buy a 17-40 f/4 and Stumble upon a nice 17-35 f2.8, TBH I'm very tempted. The only drawback being age, UL 1997 I think.
brad_wakefield Suspended / Banned Messages 385 Name Brad Edit My Images No 19 Sep 2011 #4 Forget the 17-35 try and get a good 2nd hand 17-40
C chrisphoto Suspended / Banned Messages 289 Edit My Images Yes 19 Sep 2011 #5 I had one awhile ago, and whilst it is old and does show it's age in some areas the 17-40 doesn't really compare, if you need f2.8 you need f2.8.
I had one awhile ago, and whilst it is old and does show it's age in some areas the 17-40 doesn't really compare, if you need f2.8 you need f2.8.
OP The Greek Suspended / Banned Messages 2,092 Name Chris Edit My Images Yes 19 Sep 2011 #6 Oh well doesn't matter now, as I have just bought a 6 month old 17-40 for the same money.