Rangie
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 8
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi everyone,
Im a newbie here in the forums with very little knowledge about photography, and in need of some advice and direction.
I have just started using my old SLR Canon EOS 500N again
and have two Canon lenses (budget ones?), both fitted with UV filters, info below.
Canon Ultrasonic EF 28-80mm 1; 3.5 - 5.6
Canon Ultrasonic EF 75-300mm 1: 4 - 5.6
I am wanting to go digital and looking at purchasing the Canon 400D (body only) and using my existing lenses, as the kit lens is an EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and costs an extra £50.
Would i be better off in the long run spending the extra £50 on the kit lens? or towards a wide angle lens? as i think i will be buying a wide angle lens in the future, as i love landscape and scenic views. (seen some of your landscape shots with the sigma 10-20mm lens
)
Also, can someone please explain what the numbers mean after the size of lens.
Thanks, im looking forward to learning and going DSLR.
Simon.
Im a newbie here in the forums with very little knowledge about photography, and in need of some advice and direction.

I have just started using my old SLR Canon EOS 500N again
Canon Ultrasonic EF 28-80mm 1; 3.5 - 5.6
Canon Ultrasonic EF 75-300mm 1: 4 - 5.6
I am wanting to go digital and looking at purchasing the Canon 400D (body only) and using my existing lenses, as the kit lens is an EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and costs an extra £50.
Would i be better off in the long run spending the extra £50 on the kit lens? or towards a wide angle lens? as i think i will be buying a wide angle lens in the future, as i love landscape and scenic views. (seen some of your landscape shots with the sigma 10-20mm lens
)Also, can someone please explain what the numbers mean after the size of lens.
Thanks, im looking forward to learning and going DSLR.

Simon.