Canon 1DS - Would I benefit?

Mozina

Mozina

Suspended / Banned
Messages
31
Name
Neil
Edit My Images
Yes
Hi all,

I shoot allsorts from sport to portrait

I currently use a 5d mk1 and a 7d

Ive recently been looking at Canon 1DS models (full frame version) - the mark 1 and mark 2 versions

Is it worth me getting one ? eg what would I get thats better than what I have already?

Neil
 
If you don't know why you need it or where it is better then don't buy it.

Don't look for people on here to help you spend your money, it is a never ending spiral of gear lust :lol:
 
1D series build is second to none, nice hefty kit that's built to withstand heavy use.

Sorry I can't offer any advice on whether the 1DS mkI is better or worse than the 5D mkI with regards image quality.

I have a 1D mkIIN, a fantastic, reliable piece of kit that's in a different league to my classic 5D. For me each camera serves its own purpose.
 
I had a 1DS Mk1 briefly and was disappointed with the image quality. Sensors have come on a long way since that was released.
There's no doubt 1D series bodies are superbly built and the newer models produce great images with the right person behind the viewfinder. Neither of the 2 you mention have Liveview, which may or may not be important to you and they wouldn't be the best choice for fast sport action.
 
I upgraded my 1DM3 for a 1DsM3 and I would recommend the 1D series over the 1Ds for sport. It beats the 's' hands down on burst and cacheing. The upside of the 's' is the much larger file size and full frame aspect.
 
Its the full frame I want

Believe it or not I shoot boxing at full frame on my 5d and get amazing results

I just fancy a 1ds as Im curious what advantage it would offer me..
 
Mozina said:
Its the full frame I want

Believe it or not I shoot boxing at full frame on my 5d and get amazing results

I just fancy a 1ds as Im curious what advantage it would offer me..
Click to expand...

The 1Ds MkI is capable of fantastic images but there's a couple of areas that show the age of the DigicI processor copmared to the DigicII fitted to the 5D and 1Ds MkII.

The max ISO on the 1Ds MkI is 1250 and although some feel that the noise looks more similar to film grain than later digital cameras it will produce noisier images than the either the 5D or 1Ds MkII from ISO 800.

The buffer and processing time is also noticeably slower than either the 5D or 1Ds MkII and could possibly prove annoying if you rely on shooting bursts.

Although the 1Ds MkII would offer you better AF and more selection points than the 5D, if you're already getting great shots from the 5D then I can't think of anything that would justify the cost of upgrading really:thinking:
 
Thats exactly the info I was looking for - thank you.
 
happy haggis said:
I had a 1DS Mk1 briefly and was disappointed with the image quality. Sensors have come on a long way since that was released.
Click to expand...

I think it's a bit "marmite" with the 1Ds mark 1 and similarly aged models from other brands. The green tinge is very noticeable under certain conditions, there are custom colour curves from the net you can download to combat it. I find that the 1Ds gives files that are actually quite comparable to film, in terms of colour gamut and grain - that's why I like it.

The one thing to watch out for with old 1 series cameras is that the batteries will often be worn out. I purchased some cheap replacements from 7dayshop if I remember right, they give great life but don't quite fit the body as flush as the originals did. I'm talking a gap of no more than 1mm at most, but if you weren't careful it would be enough to let moisture in. Something to bear in mind if the camera is to be used in very demanding conditions.

The 1Ds is the only digital camera I've owned that I've been truly happy with, and haven't got rid of a few months later.
 
Last edited:
trencheel303 said:
I think it's a bit "marmite" with the 1Ds mark 1 and similarly aged models from other brands. The green tinge is very noticeable under certain conditions, there are custom colour curves from the net you can download to combat it. I find that the 1Ds gives files that are actually quite comparable to film, in terms of colour gamut and grain - that's why I like it.

The one thing to watch out for with old 1 series cameras is that the batteries will often be worn out. I purchased some cheap replacements from 7dayshop if I remember right, they give great life but don't quite fit the body as flush as the originals did. I'm talking a gap of no more than 1mm at most, but if you weren't careful it would be enough to let moisture in. Something to bear in mind if the camera is to be used in very demanding conditions.

The 1Ds is the only digital camera I've owned that I've been truly happy with, and haven't got rid of a few months later.
Click to expand...

I must say that I didn't seem to have the same issue with a green tinge though as there's a custom profile it must have been at least fairly common.

I agree about the replacement batteries from 7dayshop but if you have any old defunct Canon originals try switching the end caps with the cheapies.
 
I've not had any colour issues with my 1Ds either.

It is an old camera now, the buffer takes a while to clear, the LCD screen is small and the high ISO isn't very good at all but overall I'm well pleased with its capabilities for what I use it for, landscapes, often long exposures, the photos have a film like quality which I love.
 
Chris L said:
I agree about the replacement batteries from 7dayshop but if you have any old defunct Canon originals try switching the end caps with the cheapies.
Click to expand...

I never knew you could do that, I thought they were attached to the battery. I might have to give it a go. That is if I've kept the dead Canon originals. I've a feeling I haven't.
 
Mozina said:
Hi all,

I shoot allsorts from sport to portrait

I currently use a 5d mk1 and a 7d

Ive recently been looking at Canon 1DS models (full frame version) - the mark 1 and mark 2 versions

Is it worth me getting one ? eg what would I get thats better than what I have already?

Neil
Click to expand...

nope
 
Been very impressed with the AF of my 1DsII which I would say was as good as my previous 1DIII in low light situations (nothing scientific to back this claim up though).

Given this, I think you might be impressed with the 1DsII for your boxing shots since the images it produces have lots of detail and excellent tone. FWIW, I MUCH prefer the images from my 1DsII to those from my 60D; which I guess are similar to those from your 7D IQ wise.

Also, the 1DsII AF certainly kicks dust in the face of that on the 5D which I had for a couple of years; I'll add "away from the centre AF point" to avoid being flamed.

Why not borrow or rent one (is this possible ?) to try out ? No experience of the 1Ds I, sorry.

Just my 2p worth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top