Garnett
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 191
- Name
- Sam
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm looking at the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS or the Nikon P520. I don't think the budget will stretch to the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX200. Is one better than the other, or is there another I should be considering?
A while back we bought the parents a tiny Casio point-and-shoot, as they coveted my sister's and wanted something small to replace "the bulky 30 year old Olympus SLR".
Now they are complaining about the lack of a optical view finder (and the bad digital view finder screen) as well as the quality of the Casio's pics.
Dad is threatening to go back to the film Olympus saying manual focus is much better than the modern cameras. He's not very technical but somehow gets some amazing pictures - he's got a very good eye.
Mum wants something with AF but with an optical viewfinder.
In 30 years they never felt the need to change the lens on the Olympus, and really want something smaller and lighter, so a modern DSLR is probably not an option.
Any help would be very gratefully appreciated.
A while back we bought the parents a tiny Casio point-and-shoot, as they coveted my sister's and wanted something small to replace "the bulky 30 year old Olympus SLR".
Now they are complaining about the lack of a optical view finder (and the bad digital view finder screen) as well as the quality of the Casio's pics.
Dad is threatening to go back to the film Olympus saying manual focus is much better than the modern cameras. He's not very technical but somehow gets some amazing pictures - he's got a very good eye.
Mum wants something with AF but with an optical viewfinder.
In 30 years they never felt the need to change the lens on the Olympus, and really want something smaller and lighter, so a modern DSLR is probably not an option.
Any help would be very gratefully appreciated.
