Will be on air ride. Move it back up to drive.
I always thought the idea was that things like this turns you wimmin on, no!<shrug> Dunno, but IMO it just looks bloody daft!![]()
To each his own, beggars belief how others get offended
Get over it, he likes his motor low. init You all sound like a bunch of old ladies![]()
I always thought the idea was that things like this turns you wimmin on, no!![]()
Absolutely!
After all, there's no laws against looking like a twonk![]()
It's always amazes me people spend so much just devaluing their car as if depreciation isn't bad enough already. They buy a thousand pound car. Then spend another grand on wheels another grand on body kit, then another grand on stereo. Then the insurance company asks them if they've modified their shed and bump up the insurance.
I wonder if he has informed his insurance company? I bet he hasn't
You what they say about assumptions. For very obvious mods such as the height and wheels it'd be foolish not to. Not like its a £300 corsa that's been ram raided through halfords.
I know I'm just making the point that an Audi is a reasonable wedge of cash.And yet equally as liable to report to the insurers.
They're pretty anal about the most trivial of things.
And for all we know (or not) that owner is laughing at everyone else in their ordinary boring little cars
I welcome some individuality.

Full heartedly agree. There are a number of specialist insurance brokers that are really good with these kind of modifications and power modifications. Surprisingly little extra as well as long as they know. In fact many can even be cheaper as generally the people really look after their vehicles...I know I'm just making the point that an Audi is a reasonable wedge of cash.
To be fair most of the modified car lot I know/used to know always declared their mods down to nuts and bolts because its not worth getting your policy voided over something trivial.
The one above isn't though, about £500 at most, I reckon.I know I'm just making the point that an Audi is a reasonable wedge of cash.
A lot of assumptions on both points in my opinion. Stretch isn't as bad as that daft camber fashion, at least stretch tyres still have a full contact patch (or at least should do).The one above isn't though, about £500 at most, I reckon.
As for how he steers, the wheel arches, do looked flared, add to that the insides will be rolled to give more room, he may well gave difficult steering to full lock, but once moving steering input becomes less anyway.
As for stretched tyres, they really ought to be illegal (if they aren't already) a lad at work had them on his Golf, he had a blow out at 70mph on a dual carriageway whilst in the outside lane. He lost control, hit the central reservation barrier with the front offside corner, then the rear offside corner, then pretty much the front end of his car. Needless to say a right off, even though it would have been £6-7k's worth of car. Had he not been on stretched tyres the car would have been a lot easier to control, he'd have probably just hit the barrier once. To add insult to injury it cost him a few hundred quid to get the car transported back home too.
Stretch is bad because the side wall of a tyre is constructed to be pretty much vertical not at an angle, also add the locating rim of the tyre can't sit properly in the wheel rim. None of them are ideal for road use and are all as bad as each other. Heavily cambered are only of any real use on a race car and even then not suitable for all instances.A lot of assumptions on both points in my opinion. Stretch isn't as bad as that daft camber fashion, at least stretch tyres still have a full contact patch (or at least should do).
What the heck's a stretched tyre?
That certainly does beggar belief... I mean who puts VW centrecaps on the wheels of their AudiWhilst visiting my daughter, I came across this....it turns out that is driven every day...still trying to work out how it steers![]()