Court Jester
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 36
- Name
- Stuart
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I am lucky enough to be off to Australia for 2 months in October, then meeting up with my wife for a month in California over Christmas (seeing her Brother and family) and New Year.
I want a decent landscape lens. I have got a Canon 40d, so I am thinking that the sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM seems ideal. I have heard really good things about the sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM, but is it really better? I know it is a bit faster, but on Landscape you are not really going to use f3.5, and it seems to only be an EF-S mount. The f4-5.6 on the other hand is an EF mount. Whilst the 40d is obviously a cropped sensor, if wanted to upgrade to a full sensor in the future then the f3.5 would presumably be redundant?
Has anyone had any experience of these 2 lenses please?
Or does anyone have any alternative suggestions for around the same money?
Finally I assume for wide open landscapes, and tight cities where you want to cram stuff in I am barking up the right tree with a super wide lens?
Thanks Stuart
I want a decent landscape lens. I have got a Canon 40d, so I am thinking that the sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM seems ideal. I have heard really good things about the sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM, but is it really better? I know it is a bit faster, but on Landscape you are not really going to use f3.5, and it seems to only be an EF-S mount. The f4-5.6 on the other hand is an EF mount. Whilst the 40d is obviously a cropped sensor, if wanted to upgrade to a full sensor in the future then the f3.5 would presumably be redundant?
Has anyone had any experience of these 2 lenses please?
Or does anyone have any alternative suggestions for around the same money?
Finally I assume for wide open landscapes, and tight cities where you want to cram stuff in I am barking up the right tree with a super wide lens?
Thanks Stuart
Last edited: