Ive been looking at the new Sigma Tony, 120-300 from edge of the box would be perfect.
I did like having a 300, was a good length at places where you sit on the side like chelsea and west ham, but all in all i prefer the 400..![]()
Don't forget my card Rob![]()
All sorted with Mr Fish to do a swapsey for the match.
I was thinking 1st half on my 1D4, and second half on the 1Dx I borrow from my brother. I remember Tony you saying that you were worried about the lack of 'reach' when you got the 1Dx, but saying that you had no problems with cropping.
if that crop was originally from a full frame 1DX at 100 metres away then resized to 4500px then viewing it at 100% that end file must make for horrible viewingSorry I have no idea.
I am told to save as 25 in on the long side and at 180dpi. I delete all the originals and bin the Lightroom catalogues the day after the match.
Absolutly fine on newsprint as they only print at 72dpi.It was on the 1D4.
How would it have looked on newsprint though?
Are you going to swap now then Robin ?
And heres my photo of the exact same try but taken from the opposite corner of the pitch about 110 metres away
No John, i always shoot as wide open as possible, sharper than a razor blade.Cheers gary, do you stop it down a bit?,
seems a b####y good combo. I need to stop my down to f5.6
Tony
Do you ever use a 1.4x extender on the 400? I seem to remember you saying that you hated the 2x extender - or was it both extenders?
If you use the 1.4x how do you find it e.g. loss of quality and speed of focus?
The Canon 1.4 slows down focusing and sharpness.