spitfire1942
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 14
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi,
I've got a Canon 300D with the stock 18-55mm lens. It's just over 2 years old now and has done me great service while travelling Oz & NZ last year. Towards the end of the trip I started to notice exposure problems in bright outdoor photos, particularly when there were no clouds and the sun was shining well. A few examples from my flickr collection are -
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1108675080/
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1107827253/
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1108673872/
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1108672174/
These are the original images, I have not altered brightness, contrast etc. They are all shot in same place, the difference between shots being that I stopped the exposure down in 'PIC 003' and 'PIC 004'. Hopefully you will be able to see banding from top to bottom on the landscape shots. The banding is curved, bending toward the right side of the shot. The portrait shot does not seem to exhibit the effect.
Photos not shot in such bright conditions do not appear to exhibit the problem.
The CCD has been inspected by a technican, and I have taken a look myself. I have never touched it. I have not been able to test with a different lens as I do not own a 2nd, and do not know anyone with one (or had a nice bright day to test on in the uk
).
The only explanation I can think of is that there is a problem with the apeture parts. When the light is plentiful is closes up nice and small, but there is a crack or flaw in it meaning that light gets through, causing the brighter bands. This would account for the curved nature. When there is not as much light the apeture stays open and so any flaws would not come into play.
That is just my best guess though, and I don't really understand the finer details of my camera. Before I go out and buy a new lens I would like to know if anyone has any thoughts at all. I'd really appreciate some help, or to hear from anyone who has seen anything like this before. I could throw lots of money at having the camera & lens tested, but I can't really afford to do that.
Thanks in advance, matt.
I've got a Canon 300D with the stock 18-55mm lens. It's just over 2 years old now and has done me great service while travelling Oz & NZ last year. Towards the end of the trip I started to notice exposure problems in bright outdoor photos, particularly when there were no clouds and the sun was shining well. A few examples from my flickr collection are -
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1108675080/
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1107827253/
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1108673872/
http://flickr.com/photos/mlbm/1108672174/
These are the original images, I have not altered brightness, contrast etc. They are all shot in same place, the difference between shots being that I stopped the exposure down in 'PIC 003' and 'PIC 004'. Hopefully you will be able to see banding from top to bottom on the landscape shots. The banding is curved, bending toward the right side of the shot. The portrait shot does not seem to exhibit the effect.
Photos not shot in such bright conditions do not appear to exhibit the problem.
The CCD has been inspected by a technican, and I have taken a look myself. I have never touched it. I have not been able to test with a different lens as I do not own a 2nd, and do not know anyone with one (or had a nice bright day to test on in the uk
The only explanation I can think of is that there is a problem with the apeture parts. When the light is plentiful is closes up nice and small, but there is a crack or flaw in it meaning that light gets through, causing the brighter bands. This would account for the curved nature. When there is not as much light the apeture stays open and so any flaws would not come into play.
That is just my best guess though, and I don't really understand the finer details of my camera. Before I go out and buy a new lens I would like to know if anyone has any thoughts at all. I'd really appreciate some help, or to hear from anyone who has seen anything like this before. I could throw lots of money at having the camera & lens tested, but I can't really afford to do that.
Thanks in advance, matt.
