wastedyears1981
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 126
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Howdoo everyone,
I have two prediciments (albeit a good one to be in).
My other half has agreed to me getting a new toy in the form of a new lens. The first prediciment I am in is do I a) Step further into the world of Macro and get a dedicated Macro lens, or b) get myself a wide angled lens for some fab landscapes and indoor shots. I feel I would get more use out of the wide angled lens rather than the macro, however Id feel that when I see that cute looking critter just in the right place, Id be missing out without the macro lens.
The macro lens I am looking at is the Tokina AT X 100 AF PRO D, any reviews from anyone that owns one is greatly appreciated.
The second problem is that I have seen 2 very similar wide angled lens: Both the:
Sigma 10-20mm f3.5, and
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6.
I have found two places that do the lenses for similar prices, however which one would be better for landscape + indoor use.
Thanks in advance guys.
I have two prediciments (albeit a good one to be in).
My other half has agreed to me getting a new toy in the form of a new lens. The first prediciment I am in is do I a) Step further into the world of Macro and get a dedicated Macro lens, or b) get myself a wide angled lens for some fab landscapes and indoor shots. I feel I would get more use out of the wide angled lens rather than the macro, however Id feel that when I see that cute looking critter just in the right place, Id be missing out without the macro lens.
The macro lens I am looking at is the Tokina AT X 100 AF PRO D, any reviews from anyone that owns one is greatly appreciated.
The second problem is that I have seen 2 very similar wide angled lens: Both the:
Sigma 10-20mm f3.5, and
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6.
I have found two places that do the lenses for similar prices, however which one would be better for landscape + indoor use.
Thanks in advance guys.