Advice on bridge cameras please?

Bolt

Suspended / Banned
Messages
116
Name
Stu
Edit My Images
Yes
Hi All

I am currently looking for a bridge camera but just when I thought I was sorted I see three models and now I don't know!

The three models I looking at are: -
Panasonic FZ200
Canon SX50
Nikon P520

I just wondered if anyone is using any of these cameras?

I am currently leaning towards the Panasonic due to the constant aperture through the zoom range but the other two boast a better room range but not convinced this is beneficial with taking a tripod everywhere with me.

Any advice is much appreciated.

Cheers Stu.
 
why do u want a bridge camera when you have that cannon?
 
Stuart - Wouldn't you be better off with a tripod anyway, I mean even your Panasonic has a pretty large 24x zoom on it?

Paul - What's up with taking a back up camera along on an outing? I'm picking up a Nikon P520 to go along with a D5200 when I go on holiday in a few months time :)
 
If you are getting a bridge thn gt th Canon SX50, I ordered both the Nikon P620 and Canon SX50 the other day as I could not decide on which one, I liked the idea the 1000mm and 1200mm so thought I would test them both and I really wanted the Nikon to be the better.... Sadly it's on it's way back to the shops the Canon just seems much better quality even at 1200mm it still does the job.
 
why do u want a bridge camera when you have that cannon?

Weight saving? That was my reason for getting a bridge to run alongside my SLR kit. The HS-30 Fuji I ended up with covers almost all the lengths I use (although it doesn't go below 24mm [35mm EFL]) and weighs less (significantly so) than the D800 with a 24-70 on the front. No, it's not a complete replacement for the SLRs - I miss the short end my 12-24 and 8mm give me on the SLRs but when carrying the bridge, I sure as hell don't miss the extra 6 or 7 kilos that the SLR kit puts on my back! The bridge also gives me a longer zoom than I have for the SLRs - it goes up to 720mm (35mm EFL) while my current longest lens is a 70-300, having traded my 150-500 in against a new Macro (the long lens was too heavy to carry around on the off chance so was rarely used).

Downsides? f/8 is the smallest aperture available but any smaller would result in diffraction softness. Its f/2.8 only applies at 24mm and drops off fairly rapidly to f/5.6 from 300mm upwards. There is a little shutter lag (compared to an SLR) but it's still useable in most situations. Ultimate IQ isn't up to D800 standards but is fine for prints up to A3+.

Handling is fairly similar to a small DSLR. Most settings are available from buttons rather than menus. Full PASM modes as well as umpteen "scene modes" should one feel the need... I think it even shoots video! Full specs are easy to find.

Having taken the full SLR kit away on many holidays, I'm looking forward to next week and just taking the bridge and a few (4!) compacts. There are times when I don't want to carry even the bridge and the XF-1 slips into a shirt pocket. The Canon D10 is waterproof down to 10m so ideal for snorkelling. My wife wants to take something that it doesn't matter if it gets dropped etc so I'm taking a cheap Nikon compact for her to use and finally, my Minox M3 replica is too cute to leave behind!

I did try a wide angle adaptor on it but it didn't fit straight on (rear element of the adaptor touched the front element of the lens and a spacer introduced too much vignetting) but I've got all the UWA shots of where we're going already (been going there for 15 years or so!). If I do feel the need for more, we're going back again in August/September so could take the SLR again if I feel the need. Rather looking forward to travelling light and having more weight available for goodies to bring back!
 
Hey thanks for all the responses.

Pingu666 you are correct I currently have a Canon 400D and it's a great camera. My main issue is that I only really get to travel abroad when on company business, this basically means that I have to carry my laptop with me and taking the DSLR and associated lenses etc becomes a pain and I end up talking a little point and shoot, then I see something great and regret not taking a better camera hence the bridge option thinking. It could be that I decide to sell on the DSLR dependant on the results I can get with the bridge. Oh and it also takes video which is another piece of kit I can leave at home :-)

Looks like I have narrowed it down to the Canon or the Panasonic at the moment. Thanks for all your comments.

Stu
 
ah fair enough :)
we have a old panasonic bridge camera (fz30 i think), and its probably heavier than a a77 + normal lens, but modern ones are probably a fair bit lighter
 
Looking at the options myself recently, the Fuji HS50 and Fuji XS-1 came out high on my list. The reviews tended to provide several negatives about the FZ200 which was surprising. Practical Photography this month have a decent review of the Canon SX50, Nikon P520, Fuji XS-1 and the FZ200. The Nikon comes out tops with them.

I ended up settling for a Sony HX20 with a 20x zoom!!
 
Back
Top