Recent content by yannick_reveur

and on 26 x 16 you wont see major improvements in term of print.

No i have friends having the D700 and they are equivalent in term of ISO. D700 beats canon in term of ergonomic to me, but this is because i'm now a more mature user of the camera and want to get rid of the menu as much as possible. But you know, this not 'just' ergonomy in a way because of...

Fred! your pictures are amazing! i have questions! about the pictures taken in Scotland Elgol and spekes mill, did you use a filter for the wave's effect? Also do you use HDR on all the pictures or just a bit of postprocessing. Thanks!

i have been owning a 5D mark II for about 2 years (sold on this forum and going to be posted lunch time today actually!) the colors are amazing and full frame + ISO performance is great and for this range of price. i don't see other body that can outperform it for this price. D700 is the...

yes same as the display of the camera. i'm used to work on the pictures RAW however in most case pictures doesn't need to be too much modified and thanks Craikey camera profile setting will be adapted for casual pictures shot in sraw2 for the other pics, a RAW file is perfect for more unique shots.

this is an interesting feedback, i was thinking about lightroom to use on travel which is less ressource consuming that a photoshop. Did you find it long to load pictures or is that just the initial boot that is taking time?

Hello, when importing raw files taken from the camera to Lightroom, the pictures looks different. i think there is a specific setup that needs to be applied on the raw pictures, maybe a preset for canon 5D mark I, Mark II etc. Any idea where it could be coming from?

just turn the ring until you reach the effect that it. For an optimal result the light should come perpendicular to the lens

i had my road trip 2 years ago and i went through a different way : Las vegas zion park, bryce canyon, grand staircase, capitol reef, arches, monument valley, grand canyon then back to vegas again. i flew to Los angeles and took the US1 up to san francisco and crossed the bridge! with you extra...

on a crop body i would recommand the wider lens and hence go for the 24!

what you have to focus on is the lenses for portrait and photography skills for portrait i would get a 7D and put the money difference for finance a good lens. if you want to do very good portrait 7D + 85 1.2 or 35 1.4 would be perfect. i have a 5D (until tomorrow :) ), it delivers excellent...

looks like in the coming months we will see fear of shortage in people's mind!

Raw will apply all the settings on the image same as on JPG however RAW will be a file with richer information for postprocessing hope it helps

just a word : experience! you will learn how to improve your skillz with time, just start with the basic knowledge and then try to get your own style :)

and rental is also good before investing 600+ quids for a lens, i can recommand you a very good rental if you want to! very professional, i was delighted to rent them a 100- 400 for two weeks with insurance