Recent content by smr

Youtube pay ad revenue for each video - more views = more money. But from what I have read and gathered it's not actually that much - not really enough to live off - even if your average views per video is 60k or thereabouts - what happens is that when the channels get more and more subscribers...

If it ain't broke don't fix it. If you ask any serious graphic designer what the best photography monitor bar none is right now they'll tell you it's the CG2700X Eizo 27" 4K panel released in 2022. From what I have read, for colour uniformity and accuracy there simply is no better. That said...

I'm curious now. Which monitor do you own?

It is quite comical though, to hear someone think that a monitor resolution makes you take or edit better photographs :ROFLMAO:

Ok, so you can't explain it, thanks for confirming.

Thanks for affirming what I have read and indeed what these comprehensive evaluations have produced. Independent verifiable tests like these where they measure every single metric of a monitor panel are invaluable for people like myself making monitor purchasing decisions involving several...

And on the 4K debate... I think this sums things up perfectly... "This will be no surprise for a monitor in this class, but even to a highly trained and sensitive eye it is immediately clear the colour reproduction - even just in the factory preset modes - is excellent. I do notice the lack of...

https://www.prad.de/top10/top-10-bestenliste-27-zoll-grafik-monitore/?i=1#produkte Top 10 27" Monitor for Photographers. 1 - 4 Eizo. The first BenQ monitor is 5th place. And ImageScience's review of the 2k resolution CG2700S... "We've really looked at the use of this monitor in our primary...

Again, you haven't explained why 4K is compulsory.

Not sure why you think 4K is compulsory. Photography has existed for hundreds of years before 4K resolution appeared. For me colour accuracy is more important than the resolution of a monitor, along with build quality. The 321C for instance is lower contrast than the 2700 panels, more prone...

From what I have read the best 4K monitor on the market for photographers is the Eizo CG2700X and the best 2K one is the CG2700S. That's backed up by Prad, ImageScience etc. where they comprehensively test every single aspect of each monitor with extensive tests measuring every single factor...

Are you seriously suggesting Eizo monitors are inferior to BenQ?

These two monitors are well respected. The Eizo build quality and customer support sounds tremendous. The BenQ is highly regarded and ImageScience did a comprehensive test and evaluation stating how good it is. But I am wondering which would be better. The main difference is the size, the Eizo...

And thats fine. Absolutely. I am a photographer and only interested in photography magazines so any of those other magazines and ad agency stuff doesnt and never will interest me. This photography we are talking about, after all.

I totally disagree that publications will adopt AI images either. Otherwise why not just pick up a book on paintings or a storybook with fictional images of wildlife and landscapes etc. People buy photography magazines because the images are real and authentic, and created by human beings...