not a wedding photographer, no - and you are correct... but i don't think i conveyed my self very well there.
anyway - what pricing would you set for use of a 2nd shooter then? +50% for potential 50% extra coverage (or is that bonkers and nuts?)
Definitely agree with you bass_junkie and kipax.
personally i wouldn't charge a price based on the number of photographers i'd do it based on the overall photo package quality
I see the second shooter option in the same way that film makers use multiple cameras on their sets.
at my last wedding we used a combination of a nikkor 18-200 vr and the stock 18-55 - certainly not totally professional lenses but we got some cracking photo's.
i used a pro speedlight which...
I like the dinner cooking comparison!
A couple of weeks ago i did a wedding shoot using my D40x and the nikkor vr 18-200 lens - all the shots came out lovely... but (in my opinion) the taking is only 50% (maybe less) of the overall process.
I, for one, love the post processing and artistry...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.