Recent content by Nighthawke

Canon are better - simples! Getting me hat and running..

No good for birds either - look how close that sparrow is!

Yes there are a lot of reviews on the web against the Sigmas but many are comparing directly to the Canon 100-400. As has been noted by a number of people, this is not necessarily of use since the Canon is at least half as much again in price. The reviews of the Sigmas on their own merits are...

Great advice - many thanks - probably heading for the 150-500. Apologies if anyone thinks I've hijacked the thread - totally unintentional but all thought relevant to original post.

Stuart - as this is the only post I have found with someone who has use of both the Sigma 120-400 and 150-500, how do you get on with carrying the weight? I've used a Canon 100-400 for a while but the Sigmas are a fair bit heavier. I am considering the 120-400 for less weight but would prefer...

Just a brief intro - been a photographer (of sorts) for 30+ years. Main interests are aviation (all types) and nature, especially birds. Any chance to get out just to shoot something is always good. Just need some decent weather...! Best Regards Ian