Recent content by Jonnyreb

lol - useful to know ;)

Thats a fair point, but I've always been under the impression that a disclaimer of that type suggests a cowardly attitude or immature pre-emptive strike. IE, my argument is ill-conceived and lacks research so if you dont agree with me or like what i've said, its ok as i was only joking...

I think you just re-emphasised the final point there, though. Of course the wherewithal and skill is important, otherwise we would all be 'playing like Mozart'. ;)

I came across this interesting article today which makes good reading (I thought). Enjoy

I've heard of it once - on here - but its amazing how quickly that example gets quoted and requoted. Mine focusses perfectly and is FAST! :)

yeah - think the question was aimed more at the crop on the fov than perspective (which cant be cropped........... in this space / time continuum :lol:) I have to admit - that was my interpretation at any rate.....

Even with 1.6x, the 50mm is suited to full body and the 85mm for head and shoulders Either is more than able :thumbs:

Possibly the Carlsberg of all comparisons

Fingers crossed George - hope its a simple fix! Amazed at CPS - they seem to have rediscovered customer service :eek:

Blimey CT - thats not bad at all! Even the CA in the first is 'reasonable'. Marks out of 10 so far for IQ & build?

Dont have the 1Ds mkIII George, but have not had the issue you describe with the 1D mkIII.......... Not in Canon software anyway or on the camera screen itself. I did have a totally hanging session with Breeze Systems though and had to manually shut down to resolve.

:clap: Much deserved - well done MK:thumbs:

Least: 85 Most: 70-200

Theres a little but of noise on there, and when you sharpen noise you do indeed make it more obvious. Its by no means noisy though and what you would propbably expect to see in a block of colour. The key point is the size of the pixel pitch - how many pixels are thrown onto the sensor. This...

Appreciated :)