Recent content by Itti

As the OP said, she just wanted a place to rant about it. If you want to be 100% fair then of course judgement shouldn't be placed on the bride or the other photographer (or in anyone in life ever for that matter!)... but if you were the original tog as the OP was it would still be hard not to...

You could make an argument for it being two times I reckon.

I know, I was mocking the bride, not him :) That's useful info, thanks chip!

I assume for the wedding cake she's getting it done for free by a friend with a really expensive oven? ... Because that's obviously what matters, right?

They didn't tell everybody. The Daily Mail did. I don't see what the problem is to be honest :shrug:

Sounds like a great tit to me. If you're certain about the size the only thing I can think of is that it might be a goldfinch. But a great tit is much more similar to a bluetit (colouring wise and also feeding habits, shape of beak, etc.)

Agree with what Hoppy said. If you were just taking a photo of it then that would be copyright infringement, particularly if you were trying to sell it. Compare it to if you took a photo of a painting - not really your own work, is it? Why would the laws be different just because the painting's...