Thanks guys-
D600 is out of my league at the moment -
If I was going Full frame then it would be a second hand D700-
I need FX glass first though..
Either way... a tidy D300 came my way for a good price -
D7000 - nice features but that camera body is too small for me -
Thanks for the continued info people -
I only shoot raw so not worried about jpgs or their appearence on the LCD -
My major interest is whether the D300 is less noisy than the D200 at around 800 ISO or so....
I think I'll go and "handle" a D7000 again this afternoon
D700 is tempting but opens up big spends on glass to get the best from it.
My two main lenses are the 16-85mm and 70-300mm.
Not bothered about the weight of the camera - the D200 is heavy enough!
I am just curious as to whether the D300 (s) is much more noisy than the D7000. Not so...
I have held a D7000 - maybe I'm just too used to the ease with which the important (to me) controls can be adjusted on the D200!
Re: the D300s - IIRC it only really offers video, as an extra over the D300, which I'm not remotely interested in
My D200 is great in all respects apart from its higher ISO performance -
Will I see a noticeable improvement from the D300 ?
I have read many good things about the D7000 but I'm not 100% sold on the ergonomics of this camera - hence my interest in the D300.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.