Recent content by Fixedwheelnut

I use a Lowepro Slingshot 200 and last year I was knocked off, head on with a car cutting across me at 20mph, I was mashed up a bit but my camera was fine. One witness said I flew one and a half car lengths in the air before landing and rolling. Contents at time a Canon 400D with 18-55mm kit...

.parkcameras.com/c/68/Canon-Fit-SLR-Lenses.html?Page=1 That is Park Cameras Canon fit lenses. I have a 50-200mm Tamron f4.5 that I picked up cheap, for £500 you can afford some much faster glass as every one else has said it all depends on what he wants to do with it and how serious he is.

I have just purchased one of those Pixco FD/ES adaptors with the chip in [now at £34] pleased with it so far as I have four lenses in my Canon AE-1 kit.

But if you take in to account how many people look at that disc and add all those minutes together you will be king for a day ;)

:thumbs:You can please some of the people all the time and all of the people some of the time but you will never please all the people all the time :) Some people like film, some like digital Some people like colour some like black and white, some like portraits some like landscapes and...

Very good, I do like B&W HDR I often try it with my HDR shots and sometimes desaturate them, sounds like you are defeating the object of HDR but what can I say I like the effect I read that as Gamma scale thinking I'm sure it doesn't go that high they must be using different software...

Perhaps you should try Biggereye :) I know hat coat I'm gone :exit:

Personally I like both extremes of HDR photography, for some images the cartoon effect seems to work, surely like all photos what one person loves another will hate it is all subjective. If people really hate HDR that much why enter a thread that mentions it then go "AAARRRGGHH my eyes" :)...

Yes what they said. It does have an auto mode but I prefer the other setting where you input the film type yourself and choose the dpi setting you want to scan at. :thumbs:

Mohain they are both good but the first one is a cracker, well done.

I pretty much just built this lot recently and it works brilliantly so far http://www.ebuyer.com/product/150291 http://www.ebuyer.com/product/135159 http://www.ebuyer.com/product/179081 http://www.ebuyer.com/product/158333 http://www.ebuyer.com/product/173933...

If you use Google Chrome this is a useful add on here http://code.google.com/p/fittr/ You get a short code link next to all the photos

My daughter caught smiling a few years back Canon AE-1 Programme with 50mm lens Kodak iso 200 film, this is from the colour negative scanned on an Epson V500

OK 35mm colour negative Kodak ISO 200 film with Canon AE-1 programme and 50mm lens scanned at 6400dpi with Epson V500 the first is straight off the camera/scanner. creating a 5.1mb file Second is after I have tweaked it a bit and removed the dust in photoshop.

If you mean the shots I put up? The B&W of me as a kid was ilford FP3 panchromatic film [probably ISO 400] The positive slide shots were Kodak Echtachrome film no other info and they were all developed by my Dad at his home setup dark room; The Ford Anglia shot taken by me was on Kodak GB...