Recent content by Craig20264

Correct. To be guilty of murder, there has to be an intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (if memory serves me). Pre planning is neither here nor there. If charged, he then has the usual defences to to persue if pleading not guilty. Diminished Responsibility, Autonomy, Self Defence...

I won't use anything else these days for landscape. Zoomed in Live View and MF wins for me every time. I've been let down too many times with AF missing focus. You get away with it shooting wide but not with 70-200 or similar.

+1

Indeed. Rats don't live alone!!

Get a terrier. Cat will soon get the hang of it!

Now that could be fun :)

40,000 photos in 4 years. No wonder you've had enough :eek:. Congrats on raising the cash though. (y)

https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/tamron-90mm-f2-8-sp-di-vc-usd-for-nikon.650657/ Go on, you know you want to ;) #Shameless plug

You'll be ok as long as you're not flying to Trumpton!

Going back to the choices. The consensus with the reviewers seems to be. If you need to upgrade from a 7000, then you may as well get the 7200. But if you already have a 7100, then it's not worth the upgrade to the 7200.........I think that makes sense :thinking:

Apologies. I've misunderstood the post to be comparing the D7100 sensor to the D7200.

In what way? They're both identical CMOS sensors. D7200 has an increased pixel count of 0.1 million. Not noticeable in the real world. How does the D7100 offer improved MP?

Take my D5100 instead, and I'll have the D500. It's much better at landscapes than yours :whistle:

With a lens that big and slow, and the absence of any settings. I'm guessing camera shake (too slow a shutter speed or lack of tripod). Let us know what settings you used and I'm sure we'll soon have you on the road to sharp images. :)