For me, it depends on the location or studio situation. The compression of the 200mm is lovely, but sometimes the space is a issue, so resorting to a shorter focal length is the solution. If I was to keep only one of the three i guess i would go for the 135mm, is a happy (ish) middle in my opinion
I do favor my 50mm, on a full length i think it gives you less distortion, I find the 35 bit to wide for what i like to shoot. It is of course a matter of preference, regardless you'll have fun. Having only one focal length makes you work for your shot a bit more...excellent exercise!
I apologise Simon that I posted so late to the thread, I'll be more careful next time. Tamrons are good lenses, but the quality control at least years ago wasn't very consistent, at least in my case. I ran into focusing problems with a copy of a 24-70 that I bought once. I used to work as a...
If I was you i would go for the Nikon, although more expensive you will now you wont run into issues. The value holds up really well too if you want to sell it later
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.